Business Sandesh Indian Newspaper | Articles | Opinion Pieces | Research Studies | Findings & News | Sandesh News
Contrary to recent speculation, India’s Supreme Court has not issued a 2025 ruling authorizing cryptocurrency wallet surveillance, leaving user privacy concerns unaddressed. The confusion stems from a US Supreme Court decision on June 30, 2025, in Harper v. Faulkender, which upheld IRS access to crypto exchange data without warrants, citing the third-party doctrine. This US ruling does not apply to India but highlights global tensions between regulation and blockchain privacy.
India’s 2020 Supreme Court verdict overturned an RBI ban on crypto trading, affirming it as a legitimate activity under Article 19(1)(g), but did not tackle wallet surveillance. With India’s crypto market projected to reach $241 million by 2030, per Statista, the absence of clear regulations fuels uncertainty. The government’s 30% tax on crypto gains and 1% TDS on transfers signal oversight, yet no mandate exists for direct wallet monitoring.
Privacy remains central to blockchain’s ethos, ensuring user control over assets. Experts warn that potential future surveillance could expose users to hacks or phishing, risking financial freedom. To stay secure, users can adopt self-custody wallets, use decentralized exchanges, and limit personal data sharing. Staying informed on India’s evolving crypto policies, like the proposed 2024 Cryptocurrency Bill, is key.
As global regulators, including the US, tighten crypto oversight, India must balance compliance with innovation. Without a Supreme Court ruling, users should prioritize privacy tools while adhering to tax laws to navigate the uncertain landscape.
