Business Sandesh Indian Newspaper | Articles | Opinion Pieces | Research Studies | Findings & News | Sandesh News
South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is pushing forward with proposals to impose ownership caps on cryptocurrency exchanges, signaling a major regulatory shift to enhance oversight in the virtual asset sector. On January 28, 2026, FSC Chairman Lee Eog-weon emphasized the need to limit major shareholders’ stakes to around 20% (with discussions centering on 15-20%), treating leading platforms as critical public infrastructure.
Proposed Ownership Caps
The FSC aims to restrict controlling shareholders in exchanges like Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit—home to over 11 million users—to prevent concentrated control by founders or dominant entities. Excess stakes would require divestment, potentially over a transition period (e.g., 5-10 years). This aligns with efforts to integrate crypto exchanges into mainstream financial governance, similar to traditional institutions.
Reasons Behind the Move
– **Risk Management**: Dispersed ownership reduces systemic risks from single-entity dominance, including potential manipulation or biased operations.
– **Transparency and Governance**: Caps promote better corporate decision-making, accountability, and alignment with stakeholder interests.
– **Investor Protection**: Limits help curb conflicts of interest, build trust, and safeguard retail and institutional users in a high-volume market.
Market Implications
Exchanges may face restructuring, including share sales and altered voting structures, which could disrupt ongoing deals (e.g., mergers involving Naver or Mirae Asset). Industry groups like DAXA warn of hindered innovation, reduced competitiveness, and user shifts to offshore platforms. Supporters view it as essential for mature, stable markets amid global trends toward stricter oversight.
The FSC’s ownership limit proposal reflects South Korea’s commitment to balancing crypto innovation with robust regulation and investor safeguards. As discussions continue amid political and industry pushback, the outcome—potentially formalized in the delayed Digital Asset Basic Act—could reshape the sector’s governance, fostering greater integrity while navigating growth challenges in one of Asia’s largest crypto markets.
